Back to selected founder experience

Case study · Service 02 · Enterprise architecture & operating models

Choosing a target infrastructure and IT service-delivery model

The decision was not simply cloud versus on-premises. Leaders needed to consider internal and outsourced delivery, traditional and converged architecture, containers and virtual machines, cybersecurity, organizational capability, and cost. The engagement brought those choices into one structured decision framework.

Led or supported by the founder. Sensitive client details are anonymized.

Setting
National professional-services firm
Duration
Nine-month architecture engagement
Scope
Infrastructure and IT service-delivery model

The engagement

From complexity to an actionable path.

The work was structured around the organization’s operating context, existing constraints, and the decisions leaders and delivery teams needed to make. The scope and deliverables reflect the work performed.

Workstreams

IT organization, process, skills, governance, and architecture assessmentCloud, edge, hybrid, hosted, and on-premises optionsInternal and outsourced service-delivery modelsCybersecurity and migration riskRoadmap, cost, and business-case inputs

What was delivered

Work products built for decisions and delivery.

  1. 01

    Current-state business capabilities, value streams, services, processes, applications, and infrastructure views

  2. 02

    Target-state scenarios and comparative options analysis

  3. 03

    Research on modern infrastructure, application, and service-delivery practices

  4. 04

    Requirements, gaps, pain points, constraints, and risk mitigations

  5. 05

    Prioritized future-state architecture recommendations and roadmap

  6. 06

    Order-of-magnitude cost estimates supporting budgeting and the transformation case

Outcomes

What the work enabled.

  • Gave senior leadership a comparable view of materially different infrastructure and service-delivery choices.
  • Connected architecture recommendations to skills, governance, security, operating processes, and investment needs.
  • Sequenced improvements so the target state could be pursued as a practical roadmap rather than a single technology event.
Contact

What decision or transformation is in front of you?

Share the context, the challenge, or simply where you need greater clarity. We’ll start with a focused conversation.